Demo University Workspaces · v5
University of Cincinnati · Enterprise Workspace

Decision Intelligence

A clear, executive view of recruiting exposure, controls, and emerging signals.

◷
Current Review PeriodMay 20–June 21, 2026
Institutional Risk Pulse

Overall exposure remains manageable

Moderate
72/100
+8points vs. previous 30 days

Review activity increased across NIL, transfer, and medical workflows. No critical exposures are currently open.

Low Moderate Elevated High
Priority Signals

What needs attention now

Active Recruit Profiles ◉
312
↑ 14 added this month
Requires Review ◈
28
12 due this week
HEP Analyses Open Σ
46
8 elevated or higher
Control Completion ✓
91%
↑ 5% vs. prior period
Exposure Trend

Recruiting risk activity

100755025 May 20May 28Jun 5Jun 13Jun 21
Documented signals +18% compared with prior period
Recruiting Exposure

Risk mix by category

Eligibility
92
Reputation
78
Medical
70
Transfer
66
NIL / Financial
61
✦

Focus area: NIL disclosure review is the largest current source of change across active profiles.

Decision Workflow

From intake to action

01Data IntakeProfile, academics, NIL, notes
→
02HEP ScoringWeight × multiplier × mitigation
→
03Decision PathControls, review, escalation
Cross-Functional Review

Owners online today

4 Active
SM

Sarah MitchellCompliance

●
JD

Jordan DavisRecruiting Ops

●
AK

Avery KingAcademic Services

●
ML

Marcus LeeSports Medicine

●
Sample Recruit A portrait
Featured recruit

Sample Recruit A

Men’s Lacrosse · Midfielder / Attack

Action Needed
HEP Score246 / 500
Next milestonePortal documents due · Jun 27
Offer deadlineJul 10, 2026
Jordan Williams portrait
Executive review

Jordan Williams

Football · Quarterback

Executive Review
HEP Score325 / 500
Next milestoneNIL advisor disclosure · Jun 23
Offer deadlineJul 8, 2026
Avery Carter portrait
Offer extended

Avery Carter

Women’s Basketball · Guard

On Track
HEP Score168 / 500
Next milestoneDisclosure package due · Jun 25
Offer deadlineJul 5, 2026
Mason Reed portrait
Watch list

Mason Reed

Baseball · Pitcher

Watch
HEP Score278 / 500
Next milestoneMedical clearance review · Jun 24
Offer deadlineJul 12, 2026
Fictional training case portrait
Compliance Case Study

Case Study QB-01

Football · Quarterback · Anonymized training scenario

Mandatory Review
HEP Score367 / 500 · High Risk
Next milestoneLegal & leadership review · Jun 26
Decision thresholdJun 28, 2026
Fictional demo only. Requires human compliance, legal, and athletics-leadership review before any decision.
Best Next Addition

Recruit Intelligence Timeline

A living timeline of what changed, why the HEP score moved, who owns the next action, and what deadline now matters most.

Jun 21
09:15 AM
Sample Recruit A portrait
Sample Recruit A · Player portal documents dueMissing academic support files and NIL questionnaire keep the recruit in Action Needed status.
+18 HEP
Recruiting Ops
Jun 20
03:40 PM
Jordan Williams portrait
Jordan Williams · NIL advisor disclosure pendingAdditional outside-influence review triggered a leadership-level checkpoint before the official visit closes.
+36 HEP
Compliance
Jun 19
01:10 PM
Avery Carter portrait
Avery Carter · Verified mitigation appliedDisclosure package received and medical review completed, lowering the current exposure outlook.
−22 HEP
Sports Med
Jun 18
11:55 AM
Mason Reed portrait
Mason Reed · Durability review still openPitch-volume history and draft timing keep this profile on the watch list pending final medical interpretation.
WATCH
Sports Med
Jun 18
08:25 AM
Training case portrait
Case Study QB-01 · Integrity and eligibility escalationFictional training scenario showing how the platform documents mandatory review, escalation ownership, and a no-automatic-offer path.
+44 HEP
Legal
What Changed?

Risk Delta Snapshot

Show the institution why a score moved — not just that it moved.

Jordan WilliamsPending NIL advisor disclosure and late-stage timing increased review intensity.
+36
Sample Recruit APortal intake still incomplete; follow-up documents remain outstanding.
+18
Avery CarterCompleted disclosure package and verified clearance reduced active exposure.
−22
Case Study QB-01Fictional escalation path demonstrates how sensitive issues are surfaced for mandatory review.
+44
Offer Guardrails

Required before final offer action

Offers move forward only when critical controls are completed or approved.

✓
Academic / eligibility reviewTranscript, amateurism, transfer status, and admissions fit verified.
Ready
!
NIL disclosure and advisor reviewAll outside influence and compensation documentation must be received and reviewed.
Pending
!
Medical / durability clearanceSports medicine must sign off when injury, availability, or durability factors are present.
Pending
×
Escalation hold controlsProfiles tagged for integrity, conduct, or legal review cannot auto-advance to offer.
Hold
Decision Room Snapshot Final action can require sign-off from Compliance, Recruiting Ops, Academic Services, Sports Medicine, Legal, and Athletics Leadership — all documented in one view.
⇄

Recruit Comparison Room

Compare any two recruits across HEP score, risk drivers, mitigation, milestones, offer deadlines, and decision conditions.

◌

Scenario Lab

Model how verified clearance, completed disclosures, or unresolved issues could change a hypothetical HEP rating.

§

Title IX Assurance

Track aggregate opportunity, scholarship, treatment, and recruiting-process equity indicators in a restricted institutional workspace.

Sample Player Photo Sample Recruit A portrait
RRP Player Intake

Sample Recruit A

Men’s Lacrosse · Midfielder / Attack · D1 Verbal Interest

INVITE DRAFT

The player portal collects self-reported profile details, account setup, NIL disclosures, documents, and uploads before the RRP review begins.

Current StepAccount Setup
Last ActivityNot Started
OwnerRecruiting Ops
Secure Player Link

Send the RRP invitation

Invite the player to establish an account, complete intake questions, and upload requested materials.

Secure
✓Recruit profile initialized
•Player account setup pending
•Documents and disclosures pending
Pipeline command center

Recruiting

Monitor active prospects, review exposure signals, and route recruits to the right workflow.

Active Recruits
312
Across 9 sports
Requires Review
28
Due this month
Open HEP Analyses
12
High priority
Active Recruiting Pipeline
RecruitSport / PositionStageSignalNext D1 MilestoneOffer DeadlineHEP ExposureRequired Action
Structured exposure model

Risk Profiles

Build and manage a D1 Recruit Risk Profile using the HEP scoring model.

RecruitSportRecruiting StatusSignalNext D1 MilestoneOffer DeadlineHEP ScoreRisk LevelLast Updated
HEP scoring engine

Recruit Risk Profile Workspace

Score relevant, documented risk factors; apply verified mitigation credits; generate a defensible decision output.

Selected Recruit Profile
Σ
HEP Exposure Score = Σ (Risk Factor × Weight × Multiplier) − Mitigation CreditsStructured decision support — not an automated recruitment decision.
1
Assign

Enter a documented factor and a base score reflecting the level of concern.

2
Weight

Increase or reduce importance based on severity and institutional relevance.

3
Multiply

Apply sport, position, visibility, timing, or roster-impact context.

4
Mitigate

Subtract credits only for verified evidence that meaningfully lowers exposure.

?
Why HEP works

It makes judgment visible: each score has a reason, an owner, and a documented path to control.

Assigned exposure0
Σ factor × weight × multiplier
−
Verified mitigation0
Only documented credits apply
=
Compiled HEP rating0
Low Risk · standard review
CategoryFactorDescription / EvidenceBaseWeightMultiplierScore
Gross Exposure Score 0
Recruit DetailD1 PROFILE
Sample recruit profile portrait

Sample Recruit A

Men’s Lacrosse · Midfielder / Attack · D1 Verbal Interest

Institutional Review

Use documented, relevant information and retain source notes.

HEP Exposure Output
0/ 500
LOW RISK
Proceed with standard review and retain core documentation.
D1 Milestones & Offer Clock
Watch
Offer decision deadlineJuly 10, 2026
19 DAYS
Mitigation Credits
0 verified
Secure self-service intake

Player Portal Preview

A player-facing RRP intake experience for account setup, profile completion, and secure document uploads.

Recruit Risk Profile

Complete your intake

STEP 2 OF 4
Step 1Secure Invite
Step 2Set Up Account
Step 3Profile & Uploads
Step 4Confirm Submission

Other items the recruit can submit

Use this section for anything that could help the Recruit Risk Profile review and support planning.

+Coach references +Character letter +Travel documents +Training certificates +Community service +Advisor disclosure
By continuing, the player confirms that submitted information is accurate to the best of their knowledge and authorizes the university to review it for recruiting, compliance, and support purposes.
Risk signal visibility

Monitoring

Track changes, emerging exposure, review cadence, and control ownership across recruiting operations.

Live Signals
16
Requires review
Control Completion
91%
↑ 5% since prior period
Open Escalations
7
Leadership visibility active
Monitoring Heat Map
LOWMEDIUMHIGH HIGH
4
3
MED
6
2
LOW
1
Impact →Likelihood ↑
Latest Monitoring Events
⚑
New NIL activity changed profile score
Sample Recruit A moved from Moderate to Elevated
10m
▲
Transfer documentation pending
Two recruit profiles require compliance verification
2h
i
Control owner updated
Medical clearance workflow reassigned
1d
Decision support workspace

Recruit Comparison Room

Compare two fictional sample profiles across exposure, milestone pressure, mitigation, institutional fit controls, and offer readiness.

Demo data only
Hypothetical decision modeling

HEP Scenario Lab

Test how completed documentation, verified clearance, and changing context could affect a hypothetical HEP outcome. Scenarios never alter the underlying profile.

Simulation only
Scenario Inputs

What hypothetically changes?

Use only verified, lawfully obtained information in real implementation. This is a non-binding demo model.

Context multiplier1.00×
Adjusts for timing, visibility, roster impact, and decision pressure. It does not replace qualitative review.
Additional verified mitigation credit0
Use only for a documented, independently verified mitigation factor.
Scenario Output

Projected HEP impact

Current profile0—
→
Hypothetical projection0—
No changes modeled.
This simulator is a decision-support demonstration. A lower modeled number does not clear a recruit, resolve policy concerns, or remove a legal, integrity, medical, or admissions hold. Required human review remains in effect.
Restricted institutional assurance workspace

Title IX Assurance

Aggregate operational indicators for opportunity, athletic financial assistance, treatment and benefits, and recruiting-process equity. This is an internal readiness view—not a legal compliance determination.

Coordinator & Counsel Access
!
Separation safeguard: this module is segregated from recruiter-facing HEP. Individual allegations, reports, complainant or witness information, protected traits, and participation in Title IX processes are not HEP inputs and are not displayed in recruiting workflows.
Title IX Assurance Readiness

Aggregate readiness indicator

Demo only
82/ 100

Monitor & Validate

Fictional demo indicators show a generally documented program with targeted evidence and corrective-action items still open.

  • Participation representation review is within the internal monitor range.
  • Athletic financial-assistance reconciliation remains an evidence priority.
  • Recruiting-process parity documentation is substantially complete.
Opportunity50.8% / 52.6%
Scholarships2.4% variance
Benefits & Treatment88% evidence complete
Participation opportunity↔
1.8 pts

Fictional representation gap between women’s athletic opportunities and undergraduate representation.

Monitor
Athletic financial assistance$
2.4%

Fictional variance requiring finance reconciliation and evidence review.

Validate
Recruiting-process equity✓
94%

Fictional documentation coverage for contacts, visits, support access, and offer pathways.

Strong
Restricted workflow controls◉
100%

Role-based queue, counsel routing, and recruiter-facing data separation enabled in this demo.

Restricted
Program equity evidence

Opportunity, scholarship, and treatment indicators

Monitor

Fictional demonstration metrics intended to organize evidence review. They do not establish legal compliance.

Participation opportunity
82 / 100
Financial assistance
78 / 100
Equipment & apparel
92 / 100
Travel & per diem
89 / 100
Medical & strength support
91 / 100
Publicity & recruiting
74 / 100
Evidence categories may include rosters, scholarship records, budgets, travel logs, equipment inventories, recruiting resources, support-service access, and program documentation. Final methodology should be defined and approved by the institution’s Title IX coordinator and counsel.
Corrective-action tracker

Priority review actions

Action plans assign accountable owners and dated evidence milestones without making a legal conclusion.

1
Reconcile scholarship-allocation evidenceMatch financial-assistance records to the current participation and roster evidence set.
Finance · Jul 12
2
Document recruiting-resource parityValidate official-visit, recruiting travel, marketing, and NIL education access across programs.
Recruiting Ops · Jul 19
3
Refresh treatment-and-benefit inventoryConfirm current service documentation for medical, strength, equipment, and travel inputs.
Athletics Ops · Jul 26
4
Archive annual assurance recordPreserve source documentation, methodology notes, and leadership attestation trail.
Coordinator · Aug 2
Recruiting-process equity

Aggregate access and process controls

Documented

A program-level evidence view for consistent access to recruiting and student-athlete support resources. No protected information or Title IX case data is displayed.

Process indicatorFictional evidence resultReview status
Official-visit resource documentation97% evidence coverage across varsity programsComplete
Recruiting-contact workflowMedian response time variance: 0.2 daysWithin monitor range
NIL education & referral access100% program access confirmedDocumented
Academic-support referral pathwayTwo program files require refreshed evidenceMonitor
Publicity / marketing inventoryAsset and campaign access review remains openAction needed
Offer and roster-approval timingQuarterly review queued for coordinator validationValidate
Data separation architecture

What is intentionally excluded from HEP

HEP is a recruit decision-support model. Title IX assurance is a distinct institutional equity and compliance workspace.

×
No individual Title IX allegations or reportsRecruiter-facing HEP cannot ingest or display allegation narratives, report status, or related case information.
Blocked
×
No protected-trait scoringSex, gender identity, pregnancy status, sexual orientation, accommodations, and other protected data are not individual HEP variables.
Blocked
×
No retaliation-sensitive activityReporting, participation, or help-seeking through a Title IX process is not a recruiting-risk input.
Blocked
✓
Aggregate assurance analytics onlyProgram-level opportunity, financial assistance, treatment, and recruiting-process evidence can be reviewed by authorized roles.
Allowed
Restricted case workflow

Coordinator & counsel queue

Case data is intentionally minimized in this demo. No allegation narratives, complainant identities, witness details, or protected information are shown in the athletics dashboard.

Restricted
Access rule: the queue is visible only to the Title IX coordinator, designated counsel, and approved restricted-audit roles. Recruiters, coaches, and HEP users receive no case detail and no Title IX-derived score input.
TX-26-014
Restricted MatterIntake and routing status only
SealedDue Jun 28
TX-26-018
Program Resource ReviewEvidence collection and coordinator routing
In ReviewDue Jul 03
TX-26-021
Recruiting-Process Parity ReviewAggregate evidence and corrective-action record
Action PlanDue Jul 12

Annual Title IX Assurance Packet

Generate a fictional demo export containing readiness indicators, corrective-action tracker, recruiting-process evidence status, and access-control notes.

Action required

Alerts

Prioritized notifications for recruiting operations, compliance, admissions, and leadership.

Governance & access

Team

Configure role-based access for coaches, compliance, admissions, medical, and leadership reviewers.

Role-Based Access ControlsAssign recruiters, compliance staff, and executive reviewers with least-privilege permissions.
Tenant configuration

Settings

Manage scoring scales, control pathways, decision labels, and retention policy.

Risk Framework SettingsConfigure factors, weights, sport-specific multipliers, and escalation thresholds.
Connected data

Integrations

Connect recruiting, compliance, NIL, academic, and documentation workflows over time.

Integration HubConnect recruiting CRMs, compliance platforms, NIL disclosures, document storage, and reporting systems.